[Climate News] Bangkok Floods as Devon and Cape Town Face Land Disputes (9.27)

Об этом предложении

Bangkok Floods as Devon and Cape Town Face Land Disputes (9.27) Table of contents Overview Details Overview Bangkok authorities declared a flood disaster after nearly two days of rain brought up to 300 mm to some areas in 48 hours. A proposed 1.5 GW AI campus and 1.8 GW battery system in north Devon has drawn opposition over its location, water demand and planning process. Cape Town plans to sterilize and relocate two baboon troops, while opponents argue the animals should remain on the peninsula. Details Bangkok Declares Flood Disaster After 300 mm of Rain in Some Areas Bangkok authorities declared a flood disaster after almost two days of heavy rain inundated homes, shops and roads. Some parts of the Thai capital recorded 300 mm over 48 hours through Saturday, The Guardian reported . Its photographs showed residents wading through water that reached waist height in places. The rain swelled the city's canals and sent water into nearby homes, restaurants and shops. Roads flooded, and some cars were submerged. The reported 300 mm is a measurement for some areas over a specified 48-hour period; it is not a citywide rainfall total. The immediate account describes a severe urban flood, with disruption visible across residential and commercial streets. It does not provide a final damage assessment or establish how long floodwaters will remain. Nor does it include a study attributing this particular rainfall event to climate change. Key takeaway: The reported rainfall explains the immediate flood emergency, while the full extent of damage and any climate attribution remain undetermined in the available account. Devon AI Campus Plan Draws Opposition in UNESCO Biosphere Reserve A proposed AI data campus near Great Torrington has become the focus of a land-use dispute in north Devon. British company Xlinks proposes a 1.5 GW data center and a 1.8 GW battery energy storage system on a 344-hectare site within a UNESCO-designated biosphere reserve, The Guardian reported . The project remains a proposal. Local opponents have raised concerns about the landscape, water use and the way the project entered public discussion. Documents obtained through freedom of information requests showed that Xlinks and council officials had held confidential talks before the proposal became public. Torridge district council said such pre-application discussions were standard practice and did not amount to approval. Xlinks says the project would bring investment, 600 to 1,200 jobs and energy infrastructure to the region. It also says about a third of the site would be developed, with other land open to the public or used for habitat creation. Those are company projections and plans, not measured outcomes. An environmental impact assessment was underway, and public consultation had been postponed until later in the year. Key takeaway: The Devon project joins a large computing facility with battery storage, but its local costs and promised benefits depend on plans and assessments still to be published. Cape Town Plans to Move Two Baboon Troops Amid Resident Conflict Cape Town's city council says it will soon round up two chacma baboon troops involved in repeated conflict with residents. The animals would be sterilized and permanently moved to a newly built sanctuary, The Guardian reported . Animal rights activists oppose the removal and argue that coexistence options have not received enough consideration. The conflict has become more acute as baboons enter homes, cars and shops in search of food. A 2025 census cited by The Guardian counted 493 baboons across 12 managed troops on the peninsula, compared with 360 in 2000. That increase supplies context for the pressure residents describe, though a population count alone cannot explain every encounter. The city's current proposal is narrower than an earlier management plan, which contemplated moving four troops. It now plans to move the Waterfall and Seaforth troops and build a northern boundary fence between urban areas and nearby mountains. Opponents favor fencing the two troops out of residential areas while allowing them to stay in their habitat. Whether either approach reduces encounters over time remains unresolved. Key takeaway: Cape Town's relocation plan may ease conflict in two neighborhoods, but its effects on baboon welfare and encounters elsewhere still need to be measured. In depth Bangkok flooding — in depth The canal system is central to what happened on the streets. As water levels rose, the network carried floodwater toward surrounding buildings. That helps explain why the effects reached homes and businesses as well as roads. The available report does not establish which locations flooded first or how drainage performed across the city. The 48-hour rainfall figure gives the event a useful scale, but it has limits. Rainfall can vary sharply across an urban area, so the reading from some locations cannot describe conditions everywhere in Bangkok. Likewise, photographs document the depth and reach of water at particular moments; they do not measure the total number of affected households or businesses. The distinction matters for assessing the response. Submerged vehicles and water entering shops show immediate disruption. They do not, on their own, establish the cost of repairs, the duration of closures or the pace of recovery. Those questions require subsequent assessments beyond the September 27 report. This flood also should not be presented as an attribution finding. A warmer climate can affect rainfall patterns, but the supplied account reports an event and its consequences, not research on its causes. Any claim that climate change caused or intensified this specific flood would require separate analysis. The next concrete measures of the disaster will be the extent and duration of inundation and the number of people and properties affected. For now, the supported conclusion is narrower: intense rain overwhelmed parts of Bangkok, raised canal levels and brought floodwater into streets and buildings. Devon data campus — in depth The proposal combines two large facilities with different purposes. A data center would serve computing demand; battery storage would help manage electricity supply and demand. Their placement on one site does not, by itself, establish the campus's net environmental effect. That depends on its eventual design, energy and water requirements, construction footprint and enforceable planning conditions. Water figures show why design details matter. A freedom of information response cited an estimate of approximately 2.9 billion liters a year under extreme conditions, including severe heatwaves and droughts. Xlinks told The Guardian that the estimate came from a design it had replaced. It said the new design would be released during consultation and with the planning application. The older estimate should therefore be treated as a disclosed scenario, not a forecast for the current proposal. The company's biodiversity and land-access statements also need to be judged against the final application. Xlinks says it must improve biodiversity by at least 10% and plans to exceed that requirement. It has described habitat creation and measures to reduce the buildings' visibility. These commitments do not yet show where gains would occur, how they would be measured or what conditions would bind the developer. The planning dispute has a procedural dimension as well as an environmental one. Residents learned through records requests about earlier private discussions and an April letter expressing in-principle support. The council says its confidential pre-application process offers planning guidance, not a decision. A published application and environmental assessment will give the public a firmer basis to compare the developer's claims with the site's likely effects. Battery storage has a wider policy context: it can help balance a grid with more wind and solar generation. The Guardian reported a UK government estimate that 23–27 GW of battery capacity would be needed by 2030 for its clean-power goals. That national need does not settle whether this particular site, scale or design is suitable. The pending consultation is where those questions become specific enough to test. Cape Town baboon management — in depth Geography makes the dispute difficult to solve with a single boundary. The Cape Peninsula places baboons between protected mountain habitat and developed low-lying land. A representative of the Cape Baboon Partnership told The Guardian that lower areas offer water and productive vegetation, but much of that ground has been developed. Homes and shops therefore sit close to places the animals seek out. Moving two troops could reduce encounters in the neighborhoods they now enter. It also raises questions about the animals' welfare after capture, sterilization and permanent confinement. Opponents say removal would disrupt their social groups and take them out of an ecosystem where they disperse seeds. The report does not provide a completed assessment of how the sanctuary would address those concerns. Fencing presents a different trade-off. Activists and some scientists argue that a fence could keep the Waterfall and Seaforth troops away from homes without relocating them. University of Cape Town behavioral ecologist Justin O'Riain told The Guardian that baboons might instead move toward another low-lying area where the fence ends. That is a forecast about behavior, not an observed result of the proposed fence. Residents and baboons both face risks under current conditions. The report describes repeated property intrusions, while baboons have been poisoned, struck by vehicles, chased by dogs and shot. Cape Town's management program costs about 20 million rand over 18 months and employs rangers to head off conflict. The cost and staffing show an established response, but continued encounters have kept the argument over its effectiveness alive. The strongest te